Best Practices to Manage End-to-End Business Processes in Your ERP System
It’s no secret that most ERP systems fail to deliver
the business benefits anticipated by the organizations implementing the
software. 50-percent of organizations fail to receive at least 50-percent of
the expected business benefits from their investments in enterprise software.
Adding insult to injury, and as outlined in our blog last week, is the fact
that most organizations experience a misalignment between their business operations
and ERP systems, which typically worsens over time as the companies go through
acquisitions, international expansion, supply chain reorganizations, and other
changes.
The reasons for the failures to achieve business benefits as
well as operational misalignments with ERP software often point to business
processes. As opposed to incorporating process best practices in their ERP
systems, most ERP vendors and system integrators use the flawed
practice of designing and configuring the software to handle a hodgepodge of
transactional workflows in the system, most of which do not integrate in a
cohesive end-to-end business process. Despite all the talk about best
practices, order-to-cash and procure-to-pay business process workflows, and all
the other buzz terms in this area, the ERP industry is still sorely lacking in
its ability to develop, institute and manage business processes effectively as
part of an ERP implementation.
So what can a company do to take more of a business-centric
approach to its ERP system? Here are four best practices, proven through the
years of independent experience, research, and expert witness work related to
ERP lawsuits:
1. Define your ERP business blueprint. The
common industry best practice favored by most system integrators, software
vendors, and ERP consultants is to force the implementing organization to adopt
the software by ignoring the “as is” processes and focusing on how to design
the various transactions in the system. However, this methodology is flawed (as
is proven by years of ERP failures), and doesn’t take into account the
holistic, end-to-end business processes required to run the business. A
technology-agnostic business blueprint, on the other hand, looks at the
end-to-end workflows, organizational responsibilities, and metrics required
driving the business. In addition, this business blueprint approach defines how
non-ERP processes and hand-offs will happen and, more importantly, focuses the
implementation team’s attention on eliminating non-value-add activities and
re-engineering broken business processes. The traditional and outdated approach
of simply adopting the industry best-practices in the out-of-the-box software
fails to address these critical issues.
2. Develop a business case and benefits realization plan. Simply put,
your business processes won’t stick within the organization without the
appropriately defined metrics to drive those business processes. In addition,
without a benefits realization plan, expected business benefits will not be
realized. It is no coincidence that most projects fail to create a full
business case and benefits realization plan and most of those same projects
also fail to realize the business benefits potential of their new ERP systems.
In order to succeed and fully optimize your business benefits, your team will
also need a comprehensive plan outlining how exactly the organization will
achieve the planned business benefits. For example, the plan should include
details of the specific measures used to drive business benefits, the exact
business intelligence required to measure the benefits, the person(s)
responsible for managing to the performance and so forth.
3. Create an organizational change
management plan. Defining the software and business processes is the ante
to stay in the game, but the organizational change management (OCM) component
of any ERP implementation is the variable that will ultimately determine
whether or not business processes “work” and whether or not people actually
adopt those business processes. While most ERP system integrators and
consultants think of OCM as a synonym for “training,” that is only one minor
component of a successful organizational change plan. In addition to end-user
training, an effective organizational change management program will include
organizational impact analysis, employee communications plan, project branding,
organizational readiness, and several other key components that we have proven
to be the differentiators between ERP success and ERP failure.
4. Create an ERP Center of Excellence (COE). Once your
ERP software is installed and “live,” it is important to manage it to mitigate
the operational misalignments mentioned above. An effective COE should focus
not simply on how to “fix” the software should it break or require upgrades,
but more importantly, on the steps an organization can take to ensure that the
software keeps up with evolving business needs and requirements. In addition,
an effective COE will enable you to identify training needs, potential areas of
organizational resistance, and broken business processes that can be
continuously improved via better use of the ERP software. Most organizations
and their system integrators define the finish line of their ERP
implementations at the time of “go live,” but they should also be ensuring a
framework and plan to create an organization that continuously improves its
business processes and use of ERP software.
These four best practices are critical areas that we have seen
in effective and successful ERP implementations, but which are typically absent
in troubled or failed ERP projects. These are some of the remediation we often
bring to the table when clients hire us to clean up their ERP implementations
and constitute the core of the some of the best practices we implement when
clients hire us to manage their implementations from the start.
Comments
Post a Comment